A Dividend Capture Investor Explains His Methods: a Wall Street Transcript Interview with Kirk Mentzer, Senior Vice President & Regional Manager of the Huntington Private Financial Group

67 WALL STREET, New York - July 15, 2013 - The Wall Street Transcript has just published its Investing in Dividend-Paying Companies and Other Strategies Report. The full issue is available by calling (212) 952-7433 or via The Wall Street Transcript Online.

Topics covered: Bottom-Up Stock Selection - Cyclical Sectors, Exposure to Emerging Markets - Large-Cap, Deep-Value - Value Oriented Strategy - High-Quality Companies - Value Investing, Deep Value

Companies include: Morgan Stanley (MS), Citigroup, Inc. (C), Exxon Mobil Corp. (XOM) and many others.

In the following excerpt from the Investing in Dividend-Paying Companies and Other Strategies Report, an experienced portfolio manager discusses his methodology and top picks:

TWST: TWST: Would you be able to give us a few examples of top stock picks or top holdings, and tell us why you like them?

Mr. Mentzer: This is always a challenge at the end of a quarter, to make sure I don't give you a name that's been in motion. What I could indicate in general is, a typical value manager is looking for areas that have been beaten down, that nobody wants. I'm not quite to that extreme. I'm looking for names that are maybe at the bottom of their range or a channel, and I'm looking for a catalyst. If the valuation is acceptable, and they have a good dividend yield so I'm getting paid to wait, in essence, and maybe in the economic forecast there's some ray of sunlight that could be a catalyst.

The one that really jumps out at me right now that's just starting to work are the smaller-cap banks. It fits my criteria for valuation, dividend yield and the value momentum. The value's certainly there, the momentum is just starting to pick up, and the catalyst is these higher rates, which should help on the net interest margins.

Everybody's left the small-cap banks alone, there hasn't been any interest, because the assumption is there's going to be too much compliance for them, but that's not been the case. Names like Morgan Stanley (MS), Citigroup (C) - I just haven't had any allocation toward those. But the smaller-cap banks, in the territory of $1 billion to $3 billion in market cap, I own half a dozen of these names.

Not a big representation, but they are performing exceptionally well in the last couple months. So that's an area, and the yields are robust, they're 3.5%, 4%. It's just a perfect scenario, and they're just now starting to work. The catalyst has been the Fed suggesting that they need to let rates rise, and that steepening of the yield curve is going to be what helps them gain the earnings momentum that they desperately need...

For more of this interview and many others visit the Wall Street Transcript - a unique service for investors and industry researchers - providing fresh commentary and insight through verbatim interviews with CEOs, portfolio managers and research analysts. This special issue is available by calling (212) 952-7433 or via The Wall Street Transcript Online.

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/dividend-capture-investor-explains-methods-161000850.html

Freddy E NHL lockout Honey Boo Boo Psalms 91 once upon a time once upon a time RG3

The iPhone Didn't Kill Cameras, It Made Us Want Better Ones

The Wall Street Journal pointed out today that while sales of point-and-shoot cameras have declined steadily over the past few years, DSLRs and other interchangeable-lens cameras have been doing great. That's right. People don't want to just take more photos than ever, they want to take better photos, with big-kid cameras. And that's not in spite of the smartphone revolution. It's because of it.

Read more...

Source: http://feeds.gawker.com/~r/gizmodo/full/~3/nyxERs_xdXQ/the-iphone-didnt-kill-cameras-it-made-us-want-better-789520827

Alex Minsky christina aguilera NBA Who Won The Voice Miley Cyrus Twerking Jesus Shuttlesworth Michael Hastings

Making An Investment In A Gold Retirement Plan For | Angelina Zinn

One technique to make the precious metals IRA is as simple as rolling over funds from a pre-existing IRA. While doing this, the distribution check of the account should be written in the name of the trust company who secures the precious metal Individual Retirement Account.

An IRA can be a way of saving for the future in a tax-free manner. When you invest in a precious metal Individual Retirement Account, the money become tax-free. It?s because precious metal coins could be offered in the enthusiast and bullion markets. This provides two distinct prices for the coins. This is the reason investors are very willing to invest in precious metals IRAs.

Precious metals are not susceptible to devaluation not like stocks. They?re not negatively influenced by the instability of the global economy. In case you are investing in paper assets, you?re constantly at a risk of wasting your funds but that?s not very true with precious metal Individual Retirement Account investing.

Here are some ideas regarding precious metals IRA investing. Do an intensive research before starting the precious metal Individual Retirement Account. Attend seminars. Converse with expert investors. Go through financial newspapers about it. It?s prudent for you to have a broker who?s experienced. He will be prepared to provide you with relatively reasonable prices.

As already stated, gold is very useful if added to a retirement account. It?s advised by many financial consultants currently. To get more information, kindly visit click through the following website page

This entry was posted in Careers on July 14, 2013 by admin.

Source: http://angelinazinn.com/careers/making-an-investment-in-a-gold-retirement-plan-for/

Susannah Collins George Jones funeral Jeff Hanneman

N.J. 'civil union' author: Time to allow gay marriage: Opinion

Realizing I could not get a marriage equality bill passed in New Jersey, I fought for a civil union bill.

By Wilfredo Caraballo

In 2006, the New Jersey Supreme Court determined that our equal protection laws mandated that gay and lesbian relationships were to be given the same rights and privileges as those of heterosexuals. The court concluded we are not free to discriminate on the basis of the relationship.

The court did not mandate the name to be given to the relationship; instead, it left the label to the Legislature as long as the rights were equal. The U.S. Supreme Court has decided that only those relationships labeled ?marriage? are entitled to equal protection of the law when it comes to federal benefits.

Where does that leave us in New Jersey? Simple: By calling gay and lesbian relationships by a name other than ?married,? we are depriving those relationships of federal benefits. When we deprive individuals of federal benefits based on the name given to that relationship, we are not treating them equally and are thus running afoul of the New Jersey Supreme Court?s mandate.

How do I know this? I was one of the prime sponsors of the bill creating civil unions in New Jersey.

When the New Jersey Supreme Court issued its decision in 2006, I believed the right thing to do was to pass a marriage equality bill. I sought support from my colleagues in the Legislature. It wasn?t forthcoming. Many of my colleagues were concerned that we would be moving too quickly.

Realizing that I could not get marriage equality, I then fought for the civil union bill. It was my belief that we had to do something.

While I know that many of my gay and lesbian friends and supporters were not thrilled with my decision, they too understood that we had to do something. Many of us believed we would be violating our oaths if we did not respond to the court?s mandate.

I was na?ve when I started law school, never having met a lawyer prior to the orientation program at New York University. (Having been raised in the South Bronx, I?d say this was a good thing.) One of the basic skills we focused on immediately was ?statutory interpretation.? How to read a statute? This didn?t make sense to me; after all, a statute says what it says, the law is the law.

We also were supposed to learn how to interpret cases. It didn?t take me long to realize that the language of statutes, and cases, were in fact susceptible to multiple interpretations. It turns out, that?s how lawyers earn a living: It takes two interpretations to have a case.

Once one understands, in the words of Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, that ?a word is but the skin of a living thought,? it is easy to appreciate just how difficult it is to write a law, draft an opinion or just make a statement that can be understood as meaning the same thing to all who read the law, opinion or statement.

There are a number of ways to approach the task of interpreting the language of the law. There are those, some of whom sit on the U.S. Supreme Court, who believe that the interpretative task lies in simply giving what is called a ?natural? reading to the language. That is, what do the words normally mean?

While this conclusion may seem absurd, remember that just recently the U.S. Supreme Court decided the Voting Rights Act has outlived its usefulness, even though Congress had determined otherwise when it re-authorized the law by a huge majority.

Then there are those who believe we should look to what the authors of the legislation or an opinion sought to accomplish. We call that ?legislative intent.? Practically speaking, we uncover the intent so that we can then read the words in a way that furthers the legislative purpose.

Irrespective of the approach one takes to interpreting the law, it is clear that civil unions are not the equivalent of marriage as decided by the U.S. Supreme Court. Couples in civil unions may be deprived of federal benefits. The New Jersey Supreme Court said we may not discriminate based on the name given to the relationship; the Legislature created civil unions intending to vest equal rights in all relationships.

We can use the ?natural? approach to ascertain what was said, or we can look to legislative intent. Either way, both the U.S. and New Jersey supreme courts have spoken and the Legislature failed; the only way to satisfy both decisions is to declare that the label of marriage must be available to all relationships.

Wilfredo Caraballo was public advocate and public defender in the Florio administration and spent 12 years in the Legislature.

Source: http://blog.nj.com/njv_guest_blog/2013/07/nj_civil_union_author_time_to.html

Nadia Comaneci Rebecca Soni Snoop Lion London 2012 Table Tennis badminton Dominique Dawes Gabby Olympic Gymnast

'Glee' star Cory Monteith found dead in Canada

Glee

Courtney Hazlett, NBC News

3 hours ago

MARIO ANZUONI / Reuters

Cast member Cory Monteith poses at the premiere of the second season of the television series "Glee" at Paramount studios in Los Angeles in this September 7, 2010, file photo.

Cory Monteith, the actor who found great fame in the hit series "Glee," was found dead in a hotel room in Vancouver, British Columbia, police said late Saturday.

Monteith, 31, was found shortly after noon at the Fairmont Pacific Rim Hotel in downtown Vancouver, said Doug LePard, acting chief of Vancouver police.

LePard said Monteith checked into the room July 6 and was due to check out Saturday. When he missed his checkout time, staff went to the room and found his body.

LePard said that police believe Monteith had been with other people in his room on Friday night but that video and key fob entries showed he returned to his room alone early Saturday.

Police did not indicate a cause of death, but LaPard did say that according to all indications, there was no foul play. An autopsy was scheduled for Monday. LePard said family members had been notified.

Adam Shankman, who directed several episodes of "Glee," had spoken to the Monteith Saturday morning.

"I had several interactions with him yesterday where he said to me that he was feeling amazing, and he even said, 'I'm feeling fantastic again,'" Shankman told CNN. "So, like everybody else I am devastated and confused by what happened."

Word of Monteith's death spread quickly though social media; his co-star Dot Marie Jones (better known as coach Shannon Beiste to "Glee" fans) tweeted a sentiment that was echoed by many. "I have no words! My heart is broken. Cory was not only one hell of a friend he was one amazing man that I will hold close to my heart forever."

Although Monteith had some small roles before landing the part on "Glee," it was his turn on that show as the fresh-faced Finn Hudson that cemented his place in Hollywood. And while Finn might have made him a household name, Monteith was clear about the differences between his life and the character's.

"I'm not Finn Hudson," he said in a frank 2011 interview with Parade magazine. "I'm lucky on so many counts -- I'm lucky to be alive."

Moneith was alluding to his past history with substance abuse, which included, "anything and everything, as much as possible. I had a serious problem."

His struggles resurfaced in recent months; this spring, he checked into a treatment center for an addiction problem. Shortly after his stay there, Monteith appeared to be in good spirits, as he was spotted relaxing in Mexico with his girlfriend, fellow "Glee" co-star Lea Michele.

In a statement, Fox and the producers of "Glee" said: "We are deeply saddened by this tragic news. Cory was an exceptional talent and an even more exceptional person."

Source: http://www.nbcnews.com/entertainment/glee-star-cory-monteith-found-dead-vancouver-british-columbia-6C10622696

brooklyn nets may day protests tony nominations 2012 facebook organ donor jessica simpson gives birth carrie underwood blown away chk

Google Glass for dogs: Working pooches could get a tech boost

Google Glass has gone to the dogs ? literally.

The tech giant has teamed up with the Georgia Institute of Technology to develop a wearable computer system that could give bomb-sniffing and cadaver dogs an easier way to communicate with their handlers ? or even let man see the world through an animal's eyes.

Google Glass isn't expected to be released to the public until next year, but the MIT Technology Review reports that Thad Starner, the technical lead Google's hot new product, has joined professors at the Georgia Institute to develop a computerized harness to assist working dogs,

The project, dubbed FIDO (it stands for Facilitating Interactions for Dogs with Occupations), could allow pooches to bite down on or otherwise activate a sensor which can send information to its handler, the Review reported.

Currently dogs are testing devices that would let a dog activate a sensor, which then gets activates a tone that is heard through an earpiece, but eventually the technology could transmit video from a dog to a human's heads-up display, the Review reported.

And the technology appears to work: Associate Professor Melody Jackson told the Review that three service dogs put that tested the gadget quickly got the hang of the senors, which they activated using their mouths.

The gear is being eyed for everything the deadly-serious business of bomb detecting or helping the blind to letting owners know when a dog has to go out or when it's time to be fed, Jackson said.

Being designed for man's best friend, the gear is unlikely to generate some of the hostility that has emerged as Google Glass.

A Seattle bar in March preemptively banned the technology for fear of patrons being surreptitiously recorded ? and warned that "ass kickings will be encouraged for violators."

And on Friday, Delaware joined several other states in prohibiting the tiny device at its casinos.

Google Glass has not been released to the public, but a select few have been allowed to purchase the $1,500 devices; they were chosen through a contest and lottery. Google Glass is expected to be released to the mass market next year.

? with AP

Source: http://www.nypost.com/p/news/national/google_glass_for_dogs_working_pooches_ZB2vXuTdtO1MZwxSlqYDhL?utm_medium=rss&utm_content=%0A%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20National

harden nor easter nor easter veep los angeles kings timothy leary jonathan frid

Decision in Montana boosts GOP chances in Senate

WASHINGTON (AP) ? Republicans received a boost in their attempt to win back the majority in the Senate next year when a former Democratic governor bowed out of Montana's open Senate race, a development that could further hamper President Barack Obama's agenda during his final two years in office.

Former Montana Gov. Brian Schweitzer said Saturday he would not run for the seat of retiring Democratic Sen. Max Baucus in 2014, dealing a blow to Democrats who considered the popular ex-governor their best chance of keeping the office. Republicans have not settled on a candidate in GOP-leaning Montana.

Republicans need to pick up six seats to recapture the Senate majority and are trying to take advantage of geography and history in their quest. Democrats must defend 21 seats, including seven in largely rural states that Obama lost in 2012, and the party that controls the White House typically loses seats during the midterm elections of a second-term president.

"For the first time in a couple of years, you can see the Democratic majority has never been on shakier ground," said Rob Jesmer, a Republican strategist and former executive director of the National Republican Senatorial Committee.

Democratic retirements in Republican-leaning states like West Virginia and South Dakota have given Republicans an advantage. The GOP has recruited popular Republicans for those seats, Rep. Shelley Moore Capito of West Virginia and former South Dakota Gov. Mike Rounds.

In Montana, Republicans hope to persuade Rep. Steve Daines or perhaps former Gov. Marc Racicot to mount a campaign, which could give them an edge in three of the six states they would need to win the majority.

The fate of the Senate could then be decided in four states that GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney won in 2012 and are held by Democratic incumbents: Mary Landrieu of Louisiana, Mark Pryor of Arkansas, Mark Begich of Alaska and Kay Hagan of North Carolina.

Republicans view Rep. Bill Cassidy of Louisiana as a strong challenger to Landrieu, a perennial GOP target, and hope Rep. Tom Cotton, a Harvard-educated lawyer who served in Iraq and Afghanistan, will challenge Pryor in Arkansas.

Alaska and North Carolina could offer unpredictable primaries. Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, the party's 2008 vice presidential nominee, said she may run for the Senate in the Republican primary against Lt. Gov. Mead Treadwell and Joe Miller, a tea party favorite. In North Carolina, state House Speaker Thom Tillis and Greg Brannon, a physician with tea party support, want to challenge Hagan, but they could be joined by others, including Rep. Renee Ellmers.

Prominent Republicans have passed up opportunities to run in states like Iowa and Michigan, where Democratic incumbents have announced their retirements. Reps. Bruce Braley of Iowa and Gary Peters of Michigan are seeking the open seats, giving Democrats an edge in keeping them.

Schweitzer's decision surprised many Democrats, who viewed him as their best chance in Montana despite recent reports about the ex-governor's ties to nonprofit groups that Republicans intended to raise in the Senate campaign. It jumbles the primary with a potential field of largely untested candidates that could include state auditor Monica Lindeen, state school Superintendent Denise Juneau, Brian Morris, a Montana Supreme Court justice, and Stephanie Schriock, the president of EMILY's List, the powerful fundraising group for Democratic women.

Democrats said they remained confident they could hold onto Montana's seat and maintained that Republicans would need to pull off major election victories to win back control.

"Only three Democratic incumbents have lost re-election in the last decade," noted Guy Cecil, the executive director of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, a reference to the defeats of Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle of South Dakota in 2004 and Blanche Lincoln of Arkansas and Russ Feingold of Wisconsin in 2010.

Obama's party, however, has fewer ways of going on offense. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky remains one of their top priorities for 2014, but Obama is unpopular in Kentucky and McConnell is building a large financial advantage against his likely Democratic opponent, Alison Lundergan Grimes, Kentucky's secretary of state.

Democrats also view potential success in Georgia, where Michelle Nunn, the daughter of former Democratic Sen. Sam Nunn, may enter the race. Georgia remains a Republican stronghold and several Republicans are vying for an open seat created by the retirement of Republican Sen. Saxby Chambliss.

Fifteen months before the 2014 midterms, Democrats say history could repeat itself. They say Republicans could face more polarizing primaries like the ones that created problems in 2012, when some tea party Republicans won bruising primaries over more mainstream Republican candidates and then faltered against Democrats.

"The map was always going to be a challenge but the Democratic incumbents are seasoned political veterans who have run difficult campaigns before and are not taking anything for granted," said Penny Lee, a Democratic strategist and former adviser to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev. "As 2012 proved, those who predict outcomes a year out do so at their own peril."

___

Follow Ken Thomas on Twitter: http://twitter.com/AP_Ken_Thomas

Associated Press

Source: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/89ae8247abe8493fae24405546e9a1aa/Article_2013-07-13-US-Senate-2014/id-c9903f281c36453e8b0b5008ae59280b

Evasi0n Superdome Iron Man 3 Trailer Super Bowl 2013 Ray Rice sodastream dan marino